There is a great deal of histrionics about stolen valor, and I want to revisit it.
Some people need to belong to a
larger organization that makes their lives important or relevant and provides a
sense of belonging. We have
organizations like Daughters of the American Revolution or Starfleet International
that help provide this. While these can
be harmless fun, pretending to have military service when you don't is a
different level.
Aug. 4, 2026, on Truth Social, which showed Trump in an AI-generated image of himself standing between Gen. George Patton and Gen. Douglas MacArthur.
Maybe it is to cage a free meal, impress the girls, have children look up to you; I just don't know. It's not anything new. In "You're Stepping on My Cloak and Dagger," part of Rodger Hall's training for the OSS was to penetrate a defense plant. He does so by claiming to be a discharged soldier, wounded in action. Not quite stolen valor, but would he have thought of that path if it didn't exist?
After Vietnam, a letter was
published in Playboy about stolen valor, suggesting that if you must, make
yourself a clerk behind the lines. You
could do important things, have adventures, and nobody would care. As I remember it, the writer wasn't angry,
just disappointed in these people.
As civilians, we are exposed to
military jargon such as MOS, POG, and
Blue Falcon from movies, television, and books. It's easy to pepper your speech with jargon
and fool most civilians and some former military. The internet can flesh out your story with
supporting facts.
The Stolen Valor Act of 2013 makes
it a federal crime to falsely claim you received specific high-level military
medals or combat badges for the purpose of gaining a tangible benefit, like
money, jobs, or property. But simply
boasting or lying about military service without material reward is protected
under the First Amendment.
I find all of this disturbing. Where do I find solid ground to stand in this
morass? Does claiming to be wounded in
action to get a round of drinks count as material gain? Does finding a willing sexual partner by
claiming military service and rank count?
Does claiming you would have been heroic in that circumstance mean
anything?
I don't know where President
Trump's late-night cartoons of him in uniform fall on the scale of tangible
benefit. I suspect if he wasn't the
president, most of us would think he's just some smuck trying to make his existence
more meaningful. The spotlight is a
powerful narcotic for some people.
I never served, and the thought of
claiming some connection to the military is outrageous to me. This would be like claiming to be an Eagle
Scout when you only made First Class. It
says only bad things about you.
Many organizations, NRA, VFW,
American Legion, draw careful lines around this topic, not wanting to offend politicians
or donors who have exaggerated facts about themselves. This, in my opinion, is wrong. These organizations need a strong statement about
how inappropriate stolen valor is to set a standard.
I am coming to the point of view
that these people are simply sad. They
are the same people who can't get over the 300 bowling game they had 15 years
ago, or the scout from the majors who caught them on a bad night when they lost
a cleat or had a toothache. You'll find
them at the bar, at shooting ranges, church picnics, and in political offices.
Bruce Springsteen said it best:
"Well,
they'll pass you by, glory days
In
the wink of a young girl's eye, glory days
Glory
days."
The Stoics tell us that true personal
worth comes from the decency of your motivations and actions, independent of
what others think. Failing to do that
also says a lot about you.
Comments
Post a Comment