Do you check out the Officer.com website? http://www.officer.com/
You should. It’s not
just for police. The armed civilian can
find useful information there. There’s a lot of interesting articles as well,
like the K-9 that fired a suspect's gun.
I’ll let you find that one.
Why?
Many of the same problems facing the police impact the armed
civilian.
Do I have to explain our court system to you? Frankly, I don’t think I could, but I know
there are two systems: criminal and civil.
They have different standards and drastically different outcomes. You could be brought to civil court without
being charged with a crime or even after being found not guilty. (Please note, you’re never found innocent,
just not guilty.)
In civil court, you could be accused of being responsible
because you fired too fast, too much or used too small of a caliber or just
about anything. Responsible means you
have to shovel over money. The court
could find that you are some percentage responsible and requires you to pay
that percentage of the requested damage.
Even in a righteous self-defense shooting you could find
yourself in criminal court. Don’t
forget, you have microseconds to
decide, the prosecutor and their team
have months (or years).
The best defense in both courts seems to be the affirmative
defense, which allows you to say, “Yes I did it, but I had such good reasons I
should be excused from any penalty.”
This shifts the burden of proof onto you and you can only tell the jury
what you knew at the instant you pulled the trigger.
This is where officer.com becomes useful.
“How Not To Respond On The Street” (http://www.officer.com/article/10887879/how-not-to-respond-on-the-street)
deals with the myth fostered by IDPA, IPSC and the entertainment media of the 'double
tap' stop. The article has three links to FBI studies explaining how feeble
pistol caliber rounds are.
Wouldn’t that be nice to have if you had to explain why you
fired 8 times? Think about it, an FBI
study that justifies your 8 rounds and all you need to do is print it out, read
it, sign and date it as 'read and understood' and stick it in a file. You do have a self-defense file, don’t you?
Worried your weekly practice could be twisted into something
it’s not? The opposing attorney says you
practice too much; you were looking to kill.
You can flip that coin over to you practice too little and didn’t have
the skills needed. How about having “Ammo
Shortage Solutions: One Box Workout?” in your file? Another article published by police in a police website. Do you think that might help?
(http://www.officer.com/article/10882618/ammo-shortage-solutions-one-box-workouttm)
I’m just starting. I
suspect I could find many other articles which help justify my actions and
explain them to a jury.
Tactical content?
My first and favorite instructor, Massad Ayoob preaches,
“Know where the attack will come from and have a proven defense in place.” Take that to heart. Remember the Scouting motto: “Be Prepared.”
Comments
Post a Comment