I recently had a chance to run a night shoot.
That isn‘t quite correct.
I scattered IDPA targets and no shoots over the range and made sure each
shooter had an empty gun when they finished.
CoF? That’s
simple. From the start position each
shooter was told there are people out there who have come to kill you. Find them.
Stop them. Don’t shoot the
no-shoots!
We had a wide range of skill sets. Some with TV and adventure movie training,
others with serious professional training.
It gave me a chance to draw some observations.
I saw two different basic approaches depending on the shooter. The IPSC-style shooters tended to select a
path and never depart from it. They moved
in a straight line very fast. While
several of them used their lights sparingly, the straight line path made their
location very predictable and a hidden troll would have had no problem
ambushing them.
The IDPA-style shooters tended to move off the original path and continue along a new path. They were required to use their lights more
often, as their position relative to shoot/no-shoot targets constantly
changed and they needed to confirm the target identity. It took them longer to complete the CoF, but
I believe the illuminate/identify/move-illuminate/confirm/shoot gives better
survival options to the single good guy.
Most shooters, including myself, left their lights on too
long.
All bets are off when moving with a squad and with targets
that shoot back!
It’s quite amazing how moving among stationary cardboard
targets gets your heart racing. Engaging
several armed individuals by yourself in the dark is clearly not for the faint
of heart. It also points out the
advantage to be the hidden or ensconced shooter.
So what else is waiting in the darkness for you? Illuminate, off light, move to different location! |
Another observation I made was about the light used by each
shooter. No matter if shooter used a
tactical or gun light, interesting differences were observed. It’s very difficult to hold a light in one
hand, a gun in the other and operate both independently. Gun lights appear to be slightly easier, but most
shooters still had difficultly. In
either case the shooters tended to look at the illuminated targets and not
their front sights.
Night sights/lasers.
Several shooters had them, but after using the lights, those glowing night
sight dots became invisible. Red lasers
had their problems too! Most people left
them on too much and in the smoke and dark conditions they tended to point back
at the shooter.
At least one shooter
using both light and laser was so conditioned to dot-on-target syndrome that he
was unable to engage the target he had illuminated and identified as a shoot
target. Instead he froze in place trying
to turn the magic dot back on.
Another shooter had a light that it could have signed his
position to a sniper on Mars. It was so
bright that it not only robbed him of his night vision, it reflected off
surfaces and blinded him to shoot targets just outside the cone of
illumination.
There's a shoot target behind the rear no-shoot. It's a balance between little light and too much light. |
There is no question in my
mind that anyone who found themselves staring into that light would have been
blinded and confused, but it did make the shadows darker and deeper hiding
places. The shooter still has the
obligation to his family to make sure there aren’t more than one of them.
Many of the shooters were using reloads; after all it was a
practice night. Other shooters used
factory ammunition and some used defensive loads. The difference in muzzle flash and smoke was
impressive. Some powders produces a
feeble pale orange flash that the shooter scarcely noticed while others produced
a blinding white flash that reminded me of flash photography. Some powders produced a significant cloud of
smoke so much so I thought the shooter was fogging for insects.
Not knowing what is what, my best
recommendation is to have someone shoot your gun in darkness and evaluate the
flash and smoke for yourself. This is
truly a case of little is good, none is best!
After everyone shot we got the road flares out. Most of us thought we had moved the range to
the gates of hell and were busy cutting crosses in our bullets. It flashed through my mind that crosses were
easier to carve in a bullet tip than a Star of David. I digress….
Flare light. Did I say it was bright? |
We found our eyes almost uncontrollably drawn to the
incredibly bright red flare. The
irregular light made shadows move and change and that added to the
complications. Even with tactical and
gun lights everything seemed harder: walking, shooting and especially hitting
the targets.
I don’t know the tactical advantage of practicing by flare
light. Not too many of us will need to
shoot it out against several armed intruders in a burning house or around a
roaring camp fire. It was however great
fun.
I will say that mastering the ability to stay focused under
these conditions makes staying focused under other less severe conditions appear
simple.
Tip of the hat to Larry for the great images!!
Comments
Post a Comment