Modern technology can be
wonderful.
Just the other day I was
riding in the shotgun seat of a friend’s new BMW SUV and got to see it work up
close. It has all the new technology
including smart cruise control. Apparently,
you set the interval between yourself and the car in front and the car will adjust
your cruising speed to maintain that distance.
This works best if you’re the only driver on the road. On most highways a space bigger than 1.5 car
lengths is an open invitation for frustrated, Nascar driver rejects to prove
they can draft six inches behind any car at any speed.
We were on curve in South
Carolina, when a non-descript car slipped in between us and the car in front. When that car braked suddenly, the BMW having
quicker reflexes than the driver jammed on the brakes and prevented a crash.
I was impressed and finally had a
chance to ask my question: “If the driver wanted to, can you override the auto
controls and run someone over?”
There was a little silly laugh from
the driver and his wife who was in the back seat, until my wife remarked, “No,
he’s serious.” Then it got
uncomfortable.
It appears there isn’t an
override or a quick one button deactivate.
Too bad.
It’s not too hard to imagine some
criminal jumping in front of the car with a remote control weapon (AKA: gun) as
the first step to a robbery or kidnapping.
I can easy image the possibility of you seeing a stranger dragging your
child, wife, niece, nephew into a strange car and deciding you need to crash in
to the vehicle to prevent a getaway.
Too bad if your car stops you.
The point of the story is if you
are justified in shooting someone, you’re justified in running them over.
We should talk more about this,
as I’m not discussing backing over them several times. Let’s revisit this again.
My friend driving was uncomfortable
with my question. He doesn’t realize that
I believe him to be the target of a swoop and squat.
The car on the left was following too close and the right car suddenly braked. When you break the trunk goes up and the front end goes down. |
Swoop and squat is a simple
concept with many variable scenarios.
The basic plan requires two cars and the target. The lead car tries to create a distance
between themselves and the victim just a big enough space for the second car to
pull into it. The second car, often in
the other lane for timing purposes, pulls into the space and the two cars
simultaneously brake. This causes the
victim’s car to crash into the second, possible the pushing the second car into
the first.
The first car gives legal fiction
to the second car should there be a witness not part of the scam. “I braked suddenly, Officer, when the car in front
to me braked.” Since the first car isn’t
hit and leaves the scene, all that’s left is you following at an unsafe
distance and not having your car under control.
Since you hit him, guess who gets the ticket and is cited as at fault. Meanwhile, second driver starts moaning about
his neck….
From there it’s whiplash,
lawsuits, police, insurance claims, perhaps a little fear and intimidation and an
offer to settle out of court for a healthy chunk of change. A middle age driver of a BWM might fit the
desired victim profile.
Why do I think that? From the front passenger seat on the curve I
could see both sets of tail lights come on at the same time. No lag time between the front and second car’s
break lights. It was like they had a signal
or rehearsed it. When nothing happened,
both cars sped away from us at a high rate of speed.
I guess that’s the second lesson
I want to talk about. We each have the
potential to be a victim of opportunity anywhere, New York City or the low
country of South Carolina. Take steps to
reduce your apparent victim profile!
Comments
Post a Comment